No one certainly saw this coming, certainly not after the bloodbath Mendoza’s gotten from critics:
Brillante Mendoza of the Philippines on Sunday picked up the best director prize at the Cannes film festival for his dark movie “Kinatay”.
“Kinatay” (meaning “massacre”) notably features corrupt cops hacking a prostitute to pieces with blunt kitchen knives.
Mendoza, at Cannes for the second year running, again split the critics, drawing both hisses and applause for “Kinatay”.
More: Philippines’ Brillante Mendoza scoops Best Director at Cannes

Previously, Mendoza’s film has received a slew of criticism from some prominent critics, notably Sun Times’ Roger Ebert, who said “it is Mendoza’s conceit that his idea will make a statement, or evoke a sensation, or demonstrate something—only if he makes the rest of the film as unpleasant to the eyes, ears, the mind and the story itself as possible.” (Full review here) Maggie Lee of of the Hollywood Reporter added the film was a “prurient and excruciating viewing experience that makes the audience partners in crimes of inhumanity.” On the flip side, Mike Goodridge of Screen International found “Kinatay” a “nerve-shredding exploration of crime, which is both repellent and grimly compelling.”
More: ‘Kinatay’ draws raves, rants in Cannes
Apart from Mendoza’s “Kinatay,” two other Filipino films were in the Official Selection: “Independencia” by Raya Martin and “Manila,” by Adolfo Alix Jr and Raya Martin, prompting Bangkok Post’s Kong Rithdee to write “Filipino directors are on a roll.” He adds:
The strong presence of the Filipinos in Cannes signifies a few things: This is a country mired in economic and political troubles, a country whose film industry enjoys little government support and has no official booth in Cannes (Thailand has two, from the Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Commerce). These Manila boys blaze their paths through persistence and intellect – their aesthetics are steeped in the tropical heat and chaotic past of their homeland, and it’s not presumptuous to say that they will be around in the art film scene for a long while.
More: Southeast Asian films step into the spotlight on the French Riviera
So the year’s most talked-about film,
There is no better way to appreciate a garbage like this than by consciously switching off that part of the brain responsible for logical response. As it were, this movie does not even come close to remotely believable. At its most basic level, the movie is a virtual warehouse of recycled text jokes, worn-out sketches, and ludicrous sub-plots including one where the lead star Ai-Ai delas Alas gets elected as president of the country. That in itself exposes the movie writers’ lack of creativity and originality. See, at some point, comedy has got to be elevated beyond the 2-digit IQ level and still be funny.
There is a reason the Coen Brothers are famous for their dark humor: The situations they create in movies like
If there’s one thing this movie was successful in accomplishing, it’s creating tension where there is none. With a plot that can only be best described as flimsy,
Save for the interesting title, nothing much is going on in this